|
|
Post by Sarah on May 16, 2011 7:24:18 GMT -5
Cody. Rob isn't anywhere near as awful Russell was to everyone. When he blindsided people, he laughed in their face. Also, in the end.. He only "turned" on his alliance at f6. He actually DID bring them there, so in a way, he was as loyal as he could have been to an alliance of 6. And there was a David on the jury <3 which helps.
|
|
erika
Evicted 
b0ss[Mo0:59]
Posts: 599 
|
Post by erika on May 16, 2011 13:23:00 GMT -5
Rob obviously deserved to win, but that's not really saying much. In other news, I think I'm done with Survivor. Next season is exactly the same just with an ever more retarded name.  The only way I'll watch is if Trollmanda and Horselle come back. kthnx. Although I think it's obvious it's going to be Matt and Andrea. |
|
|
|
Post by DJ Carrot Pickle Head on May 16, 2011 14:01:10 GMT -5
Also it makes me sick about how much everyone jizzes on Boston Rob for winning. Don't get me wrong I think he played the best game in the history of the show this year. At the same time if Russell gets a jury like this, he wins Samoa unanimously. Instead a ton of people keep ragging on Russell how he can't win. This just goes to show how the end game is pretty much all luck, do you get a bitter jury or an actual jury? I agree, but I also think Rob picked two people to bring to the end that made it impossible to NOT give him the win, whereas Russ brought Natalie who was actually able to make a case for herself and was well-liked by the Jury. |
|
|
|
Post by Will on May 16, 2011 15:30:43 GMT -5
Cody. Rob isn't anywhere near as awful Russell was to everyone. When he blindsided people, he laughed in their face. Also, in the end.. He only "turned" on his alliance at f6. He actually DID bring them there, so in a way, he was as loyal as he could have been to an alliance of 6. And there was a David on the jury <3 which helps. Rob didn't have to blindside everyone in his alliance, he could have been straight up and told Grant he was leaving, same thing with Andrea and Ashley. He had the idol, there was nothing they could do about it, instead he made it a blindside for the lolz. |
|
|
|
Post by Will on May 16, 2011 15:44:39 GMT -5
Also it makes me sick about how much everyone jizzes on Boston Rob for winning. Don't get me wrong I think he played the best game in the history of the show this year. At the same time if Russell gets a jury like this, he wins Samoa unanimously. Instead a ton of people keep ragging on Russell how he can't win. This just goes to show how the end game is pretty much all luck, do you get a bitter jury or an actual jury? I agree, but I also think Rob picked two people to bring to the end that made it impossible to NOT give him the win, whereas Russ brought Natalie who was actually able to make a case for herself and was well-liked by the Jury. Samoa jury votes for Natalie to win.  |
|
erika
Evicted
b0ss[Mo0:59]
Posts: 599
|
Post by erika on May 16, 2011 15:52:56 GMT -5
Well that's with your assumption that Russ' gameplay = Rob's which I don't think it did. But I really don't want to get into a Midget Hantz arguement. |
|
|
|
Post by Will on May 16, 2011 16:03:49 GMT -5
I'm saying the jury stage of the game is all luck.
Rob would lose to the Samoa jury. Russell would win with the Redemption Island jury. :-P
|
|
|
|
Post by DJ Carrot Pickle Head on May 16, 2011 16:07:29 GMT -5
I'm saying the jury stage of the game is all luck. Rob would lose to the Samoa jury. Russell would win with the Redemption Island jury. :-P Hmm...possibly. I don't know if I agree completely. But that's why in Survivor and BB you must also analyze the people you let get to the Jury stage and determine how to play the game / play with those people based on how you think they would cast their votes. Some people appreciate gameplay, some vote for the person who won the most competitions, some vote based on emotion. You have to be able to read all that and go from there.... that's why I truly believe there is never a "winning" strategy; the cast each season always determines how you should play if you're playing to win. |
|
|
|
Post by Will on May 16, 2011 16:17:10 GMT -5
Very well put.  |
|
|
|
Post by Sarah on May 16, 2011 16:24:50 GMT -5
No Cody. He did that because he didn't want anyone to scramble and decide they should work together to vote him out. There was a strategy behind it, not "just for the lolz."
|
|
Angie
Evicted
TEAM TAYLOR...and prejury![Mo0:86]
Posts: 1,118
|
Post by Angie on May 16, 2011 16:27:55 GMT -5
People who do it for teh lolz > people who do it for teh srs
|
|
The only way I'll watch is if Trollmanda and Horselle come back. kthnx. Although I think it's obvious it's going to be Matt and Andrea. 
